The Defeat Of The South - 1429 Words

Many historians offer various reasons for the defeat of the South (Confederacy) in its battle against the North (Union) during the Civil War. Some of the theories historians offer include the overriding Union power in people, manufacturing, raw material and other reserves; financial failure, due to the Union blockade of ports and ruining the railway structure; political infighting among the Confederacy; and persistent loyalty to states’ rights causing opposition between the government in Richmond and the assorted Southern states. This paper’s purpose is to espouse a theory that a combination of these factors provides a thorough explanation as to why the South lost the Civil War (1861-1865). The North maintained staggering strength throughout the Civil War; the North had the advantage of numbers and skilled generals in regards to overriding Union power in people. Civil War historian, William C. Davis, suggests that the South possessed only one good army general, Robert E. Lee; whereas the North nurtured along people like Ulysses S. Grant, William T. Sherman, Philip Sheridan and George H. Thomas (Zebrowski, 1995). The North also benefited from the leadership of Abraham Lincoln who became president of the United States in 1860. Due to the deluge of immigrants pouring into the North, the population in the North enormously outnumbered the Confederacy population. The Union army called 2.1 million Northerners to arms to fight; whereas the South rallied 880,000 men to serve in theShow MoreRelatedCommunist Leader Joseph Stalin : The Death Of One Man1661 Words   |  7 PagesCivil War, a four year strife over sectionalism. While both sides suffered heavy losses, the Union was ultimately able to defeat the Confederates States of America in 1865 after the Confederates surrendered. Nonetheless, such defeat could have been avoided in the case that the South held true to their values and exhibited the resilience which many believed characterized the South. All in all, the Civil War could have become a victory for the Confederate States of America, in retrospect, on the basisRead MoreSouth Vs. The South By William Freehling1461 Words   |  6 Pages The South vs. The South by William Freehling is a narrative that focuses on the civil war that affected a vast number of Southerners who opposed the Confederacy regardless of whether they were white or black. These â€Å"anti-Confederates,† as termed by Freehling comprised Slaves and Boarder state whites who together formed half the southern population and were significant to the Union victory. By weakening the Confederacy military, contributing manpower and resources to the Union and dividing the southernRead MoreWilliam Freehling, The South Vs. South1476 Words   |  6 PagesSurname 1 Parler S/s 04/20/2015 William Freehling, The South Vs. The South The South vs. The South by William Freehling is a narrative that focuses on the civil war that affected a vast number of Southerners who opposed the Confederacy regardless of whether they were white or black. These ?anti-Confederates,? as termed by Freehling comprised Slaves and Boarder state whites who together formed half the southern population and were significant to the Union victory. By weakening the ConfederacyRead MoreOld Man and the Sea A Man Can Be Destroyed but Not Defeated627 Words   |  3 Pageswhen it looks like hope is lost, but is never defeated. Destruction means to completely ruin or spoil. Santiago experienced this destruction. It started with 84 days of not catching anything. He was being crushed but his spirit and pride prevented defeat. During the fight with the marlin, he physically was being destroyed. He had a choice to spare his life and let the fish go but he knew he had to overcome his destruction so he kept at it and caught the fish. And finally, the fight with the sharksRead MoreCommunist Leader Joseph Stalin : The Death Of One Man1246 Words   |  5 PagesCivil War, a four year strife over sectionalism. While both sides suffered heavy losses, the Union was ultimately able to defeat the Confederates States of America in 1865 after the Confederates surrendered. Nonetheless, such defeat could have been avoided in the case that the South held true to their values and exhibited the resilience which many believed characterized the South. All in all, the Civil War could have become a victory for the Confederates St ates of America, in retrospect, on the basisRead MoreThe Battle Of Gettysburg As A Turning Point Of Civil War1048 Words   |  5 Pagesfor the Union who had the lower hand in the war and he conventionally considered this battle to be a turning point in Civil War (pg.147). He also stated that Gettysburg was the northern most offensive marching point for the Confederate and after the defeat, never again they were able to get the strength to carry the war due to the huge loss in manpower (pg.148). He also constantly reminded of how formidable the Confederate’s army was in comparison to the Union’s yet at the end, the battle is believedRead MoreWhy the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.1314 Words   |  6 PagesWhy the North Won the Civil War Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purposeRead MoreThe Confederate War : How Popular Will, Nationalism, And Military Strategy1360 Words   |  6 Pagesextraordinary scholarly work entitled The Confederate War: How Popular Will, Nationalism, and Military Strategy Could Not Stave off Defeat. Throughout the course of his work, Gallagher takes issue with the model put forth by many contemporary historians that the collapse of the Confederacy was more a case of internal decay on the Southern home front rather than military defeat on the field of battle. As a persuasi ve alternative, Gallagher contended that these historians are guilty of failing to realizeRead MoreThe Unions Ability to Conduct Total Warfare and Confederate Defeat931 Words   |  4 PagesThe Unions Ability to Conduct Total Warfare and Confederate Defeat The American War for Independence was a successful struggle of a smaller nation fighting a larger, more powerful force. However, in the case of the American Civil War, the larger more powerful Union defeated the southern Confederacy. The Union won the Civil War because the Confederacy could not sustain a war of attrition in the Napoleonic style that evolved into Total War. This paper will briefly explain what Napoleonic warfareRead MoreThe Battle Of The War1498 Words   |  6 PagesConfederates enter the war with a belief that would also sustain them during war years and ultimately shape the south after the war, a durable belief in their invincibility. Even after major turning points of the war, diehard Rebels continued to express a resilient belief in their invincibility. They were unconquerable and they truly stuck it about because they expected to win. Their ethos; beliefs of being highly favored children of God, attitudes of invincibility (homegrown and those spread